The Center for
Messianic Learning 

Unapologetically Pro-Torah
Unashamedly Pro-Israel
Irrevocably Zionist
“… out of Tziyon will go forth Torah, the word of ADONAI from Yerushalayim.”
(Isaiah 2:3)

If your life is not in jeopardy for what you believe, you’re probably on the wrong side!

Like this page? Share it. MeWe Logo ParlerLogo WimKin Logo CloutHub Others:Bookmark and Share

Search My Site

Mobile Users: The page will display properly if you hold your device in “landscape”
position and use your touch gesture to resize the page to fit your screen.

The Model for the Messianic Community
What the First Century Messianic Community Looked Like
and Why We Should Look the Same Today

What did Messiah Yeshua expect His Body and Bride to look like,
and how close have we come to His expectations?

MRav Dr. Ari Levitt
ThM, ThD, DMin, MA, MBA, ND

Read it as a flip book

Back to Chapter 11

Chapter 12.
Where Did the Word “Church” Come From?

[Much of the information in this chapter is speculation on my part, but is my
best opinion based on the best research available to me at the present time.]

“Conventional,” “orthodox evangelical,” or “dispensational” Christian theology teaches that the “Church” came into existence at Pentecost and will cease to function in its present capacity at “the Rapture” (also known as “the Second Coming” or the “Translation of the Church”), and that the “Church” therefore consists of all the saints of “the present age,” and I faithfully taught that doctrine for over thirty years. My diligent studies of the Scriptures over the past 20 years or so have rendered that teaching in very serious doubt in my mind for the following reasons:

 a. The Greek word that is translated “church” in the English Bibles is ekklesia (ekklesia), which is made up of the two Greek words ek (ek), which means “out of,” and kaleo (kaleo), which means “to call.” Ekklesia (ekklesia) therefore means “called out” or, when used with the definite article (“the”), “the called out ones.” This concept carries with it the idea of being “elect” or “chosen,” and it should be properly translated as either “called out” or “the called out ones” or simply “the elect” for simplicity sake. Other than the pre-existing religious bias of the Bible translators and the traditions of men, there is absolutely no grammatical reason for this word to have ever been translated as “church.” (Thus in Spanish, the word is not even translated, but only transliterated as iglacia.)

 b. The Hebrew word arqm (miqra) carries the same meaning as the Greek word ekklesia, and is used in the Tenakh (the “Hebrew Bible” or so-called “Old Testament” — the only “Bible” that Yeshua and his Shliachim [Emissaries or Apostles] had) to refer to the “holy convocations” of Israel. Miqra can also readily be translated as “called out.”

 c. While most “conventional” Christian theologians teach that the so-called “Old Testament Saints” were saved by obedience to Torah (usually mistranslated as “the Law”), the Apostolic Scriptures (or so-called “Renewed Covenant” or “New Testament”—particularly Hebrews 11; Romans 3:21-4:25; and Romans 11) teach that salvation (justification) has always been solely on the basis of faith in Mashiach, totally apart from any “works of righteousness,” and Rabbinical literature from the Second Temple Period to the present reveals that Judaism recognizes no such concept as “justification through Torah observance.”

 d. The “called out ones” before the resurrection of Mashiach were justified (saved, or declared righteous) by faith in the completed work of Mashiach that was yet to be performed.

 e. The “called out ones” after the resurrection of Mashiach are justified (saved, or declared righteous) by faith in the exact same completed work of Mashiach that has now been performed.

 f. The “called out ones” before the resurrection of Mashiach were either born or adopted as Israelites. (Genesis 17:10-13; Exodus 12:43-51; Deut 16:10-11; Josh. 8:33)

 g. The “called out ones” after the resurrection of Mashiach are either born or adopted as Israelites. (Hosea 1:10; 2:23; Romans 9:1-8; cp. Romans 8:15,23; Romans 11:17-27; Galatians 4:5; Ephesians 1:5; Ephesians 2:11-13)

 h. The “called out ones” before the resurrection of Mashiach and the “called out ones” after the resurrection of Mashiach are therefore related to Mashiach in exactly the same manner. (Romans 3:30)

Where, then, is the Scriptural basis for saying that “the called out ones” before the resurrection and the “called out ones” after the resurrection are two different groups of humanity?

There is, therefore, no Scriptural basis whatsoever to claim that God started something “new” or “different” at Pentecost. In fact, the Apostolic Scriptures clearly state that at the Pentecost event in Acts 2 the new Messianic Believers were “added to” that which was already in existence:

“So then, those who had received his word were baptized; and that day there were added about three thousand souls.” (Acts 2:41, NAS; emphasis added)

If three thousand souls were added that day, they were of necessity added to something already existing. If they were added to something already existing, then it is simply not possible that something “new” began that day,

The only apparent difference between “the called out ones” before that Pentecost day and “the called out ones” after that Pentecost day is that Ruach HaKodesh was now to permanently indwell those who came to faith in Mashiach, whereas before Pentecost that indwelling seems (at least from our limited human perspective) to have been more temporary in nature.

Although the exact etymology of the modern English word “church” is far from certain, some dictionaries indicate that the word is supposedly derived from the Middle English word chirche or kirke, which in turn is derived from the Greek word kyriakos, which is said to mean “belonging to the Lord.” However, the strongest evidence against that position is simply that the word kirke is far more ancient than Christianity, and was originally derived from the name of the pagan sun-goddess Circe, whose priests and priestesses gathered in a “circle” to worship her (hence the source of the word “circle”).

Following this line of reasoning, some other Bible dictionaries and commentaries suggest that “church” came to be used as a substitute for the Greek word ekklesia because it is thought that early Messianic Believers may have met in a circle. However, that concept is highly suspect because if one correctly understands that the believers met in synagogues until far after the end of the first century, there is nothing specific in synagogue worship that lends itself to the concept of a circle, unless it refers to Davidic dance, which is generally performed in a circle.

It is highly possible, however, that the practice of meeting in a “circle” could have developed during the Middle Ages (5th through 16th centuries), particularly in the British Isles, due to the influence of the Druids, Celts, and Saxons.

Throughout England, pagan religious gatherings were always held in a circle. The Druids [with their henges dating from 3,200 BCE or earlier (particularly Stonehenge)], the Celts, and Saxons also met in stone circles to worship their gods. Many of these stone circles still exist throughout England and about twenty-eight are found in the Wycliffe’s Yorkshire area. Many of the first English Christian buildings for worship were located on these circle sites or were built using stones from these circles. Through this association, the people of Wycliffe’s day continued to call these buildings a “kirk” (Scottish), a cirice (Old English), or chirche (Wycliffe’s version), each variation meaning “circle” and describing a place — occult — and not the people.[134]
The etymology of this word is generally assumed to be from the Greek, Kuriou oikos (house of God); but this is most improbable, as the word existed in all the Celtic dialects long before the introduction of Greek. No doubt the word means “a circle.” The places of worship among the German and Celtic nations were always circular. (Welsh, cyrch; French, cirque; Scotch, kirk; Greek, kirk-os, etc.) Compare Anglo-Saxon circe, a church, with circol, a circle.[135]

Still other dictionaries and commentaries suggest that the word “church” is derived from the Teutonic kirk or kirche, which is a circle of trees that was used for human sacrifices (again apparently related to Circe-worship).

Since the “Church” as we know it today owes most of its form and function to its Roman Catholic ancestor, I believe that the best explanation is that the word “church” apparently actually refers to the “inner circle” of the Babylonian Mystery Religion (closely related to the Teutonic kirk in both form and function).

In the instructions to the translators of new Bible to be authorized for use by the Church of England, King James I specifically directed, “The old ecclesiastical words to be kept, as the word church, not to be translated congregation,” and “The names of the prophets and the holy writers, with the other names in the text, to be retained, as near as may be, accordingly as they are vulgarly used.”[136]

In my opinion, these instructions did the world a disservice, in that retaining “the old ecclesiastical words” the anti-Jewish prejudice of virtually all English translations was intentionally perpetuated. [The fact that the King directed the translators to regard church tradition as more important than accurate translation adds to my overall distrust of the KJV as a reliable translation of the text.]

In 63 BCE Julius Caesar was officially recognized as the head of the Romanized form of the Babylonian Mystery Religion (which, though many different names are used for the gods and goddesses, is in reality the worship of Nimrod — the king of Babel who built the famous tower, Genesis 10:4-14 — and his mother, the “Queen of Heaven,” who became known as Ishtar), and was given the title of Pontifex Maximus, or “supreme bridge” (that is, the supreme bridge between man and the gods). That title was continuously held by the Roman emperor until 376 CE, when Emperor Gratian rejected the title, and transferred it to the Bishop of Rome, the Pope, who retains the title to this day.

When he became Emperor, Constantine (Pontifex Maximus of the Mystery Religion) desired to consolidate his power over both the civil and religious aspects of the Empire (ca. 311). At that time, Judaism (which included HaDerek, as Messianic Judaism was then known, as a sub-set, or “sect” of Judaism) was one of the “authorized” religions of the Empire. Constantine, who never actually became a Believer in Messiah, simply decreed that his more-inclusive religion, which he called “Christianity,” would be the “official” and only acceptable religion in the Empire.

All Constantine allegedly did was to take the Roman version of the Babylon Mystery Religion, dress it up with “Bible words,” and change the names of the pantheon of “gods” and “goddesses” to the names of prominent first-century Messianic Believers, particularly the Apostles. The names of the gods and goddesses were then removed from their statues in the Roman temples, their new names were chiseled into place, and the “worship” of these gods and goddesses continued as “the veneration of saints.” (For example, the mother of Nimrod, who was worshipped as the “Queen of Heaven,” was renamed “Mary” and continued to be worshipped as the “Queen of Heaven,” and the statue of “Peter” that presently stands in the Vatican is actually a statue of the Roman god Jupiter, which has simply been renamed. [137])

The first level of pagan priests under Constantine was supposedly known as the “circle” and derived that name from their practice of meeting in a circle to worship their chief god Jupiter, the equivalent of the Greek god Zeus. (See the reference to the worship of Circe, above.) Sun worship (the worship of Saturn) was so prevalent in ancient Rome that they named the first day of the week Sun-day, and had a law that no work could be done on Sun-day under penalty of death.

Constantine simply appointed the priests from the Mystery Religion as “bishops” (now called the College of Cardinals) in his new hybrid religion, and he himself continued to rule over them as their “high priest” (Pontifex Maximus).

He then called the Council of Nicaea, to which only the Gentile bishops were invited, and made the observance of any Jewish tradition punishable by death. Passover, Unleavened Bread, and First Fruits were replaced with the Feast of Ishtar (one of the many names of the pagan goddess of fertility — two of the most common symbols of fertility are eggs and rabbits); Shabbat worship was replaced with Sun-day worship; the Lord’s “birthday observance” was moved from Sukkot (Tabernacles) to Saturnalia (the feast of Saturn, Jupiter’s father, observed on December 25); all Hebrew versions of the Scriptures were destroyed [including, I believe, all extant copies of the original Hebrew versions of the Apostolic Writings, thus we now have only the remaining Greek copies]; and all Messianic Jewish Believers were given the choice to either become “Gentile Christians” or die.

It is entirely possible that by the time the Bible was finally translated into English, the entire pagan Roman cult had come to be known as “the circle” and this term was later rendered into Old and Middle English as “church.”

When Tyndale produced the first English translation of the Bible, he correctly translated the word ekklesia as “assembly.” However, when King James commissioned the 1611 translation, he specifically decreed that the word be translated using the common term for the Roman cult, “church,” and so that tradition has also been followed by modern translators without regard to the actual grammatical meaning of the word ekklesia.

The body of true “Called Out Ones” (Miqra or Ekklesia) that Yeshua established — beginning with Avraham — has always survived alongside the apostate versions of both the synagogue and the “church,” just as He predicted in His parable of the wheat and the tares (Matt. 13:1-30). He will sort them all out when He returns to rule over the earth.

[This opinion is where my research has currently taken me.
 The subject is still under serious investigation.]

To Chapter 13


134. Steve Bydeley, “A Study in the Word Church” church.html [RETURN]

135. Entry “church” in The Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, E. Cobham Brewer, 1894. [RETURN]

136. Isaac H. Hall, ed., The Revised New Testament and History of Revision, giving a literal reprint of the Authorized English Edition of the Revised New Testament, with a brief history of the origin and transmission of the New Testament Scriptures, and of its many versions and revisions that have been made, also a complete history of this last great combined movement of the best scholarship of the world; with reasons for the effort; advantages gained; sketches of the eminent men engaged upon it, etc., etc. prepared under the direction of Professor Isaac H. Hall, LL.B.; Ph. D. Philadelphia: Hubbard Brothers; Atlanta: C.R. Blackall & Co.; New York: A.L. Bancroft & Co., 1881. Accessed online 28 July 2016 at [RETURN]

137. Woodrow, Ralph. Babylon Mystery Religion. Riverside, CA: Ralph Woodrow Evangelistic Association, 1966, pp. 79, 89-91. [RETURN]


For more information:

Do a Google search for "circe church" for more articles

A few minor revisions on 04 November 2019.

Page last updated on Wednesday, 13 January 2021 01:32 PM
(Updates are generally minor formatting or editorial changes.
Major content changes are identified as "Revisions”)