If your life is not in jeopardy
for what you believe, you’re probably on the wrong side!
If you don’t believe Genesis 1-11,
how can you possibly believe John 3:16?
“Indeed, all who want to live a godly
life united with the Messiah Yeshua will be persecuted.” (2Tim 3:12)
It is what you actually believe that determines how you walk out your faith,
“but avoid stupid controversies, genealogies, quarrels and fights
about the Torah; because they are worthless and futile.” (Titus 3:9)
Please Note: Absolutely nothing on this website should be taken as anti-Church or anti-Rabbinic. I am not anti-anything or anti-anyone. I am only pro-Torah and pro-Truth (see “Philosophy”), but sometimes the Truth upsets our long-held beliefs. I know it certainly upset mine! For example, see “Why Isn’t My Theology Consistent Throughout the Website?”
Developing a
Systematic Messianic Theology
“The purpose of careful theological formulations is not to put barriers in the way of people who are seeking salvation, but to define clearly the truths upon which genuine [Biblical] faith rests, so that people will not be misled by false doctrines.” [Bowman]
“It must be clearly and unequivocally stated that theology cannot save you. Only faith in Messiah Yeshua can save you. Theology can only give you sound doctrine.” [RLS]
Unless otherwise specified, throughout the Theology section of my website I use the term “Torah” in the wider sense of including the entire body of inspired Scripture: both the Tanakh and the Apostolic Writings. I personally do not consder any other so-called “sacred writings” either inspired by God or authoritative for the Believer’s walk of faith. Thus, I do not consider the Mishnah (the “Oral Torah”) as part of Torah. You should make up your own mind.
[Explanations of rabbinic citations are HERE]
Baptism and Betrothal
Subject: Baptism articles
Dear Pastor Ari,
I very much enjoyed reading your articles on Baptism. I am a pastor in an Evangelical Presbyterian church in Michigan and gleaned a lot from your writing. As I have been preparing for an upcoming sermon, the Lord has demonstrated to me how much the term baptism is referring to Baptism of the Holy Spirit in the NT. Rom 6, Gal. 4, Eph. 4, and Col. 2.
Quick question. Why wouldn’t 1 Peter also be baptism of the Holy Spirit as well?
Thx. and blessings!
Pastor x. x. [identity concealed for privacy]
Associate Pastor, [church identity concealed for privacy]
Dear Pastor “Timothy,”
If you are referring specifically to 1Pet. 3:21, I believe that that Peter is referring to Believer’s telivah, the immersion of a new Believer in Messiah in water, as a symbol of what has already transpired in the Believer’s life-- that is, the “Baptism of the Holy Spirit” (Ruach HaKodesh) by which the Believer is immersed positionally and permanently into Messiah. Not that the actual water, or even the act of immersion itself, has any efficacious power at all, but that it is the outward symbol of the completed work of Messiah as applied to the Believer by Ruach HaKodesh. The immersion in water, however, represents a formal pledge or commitment on the part of the believer to turn away from sin and to walk in obedience to Torah with the help and empowerment of Ruach HaKodesh.
I particularly like Dr. David Stern’s translation in the Complete Jewish Bible: “This also prefigures what delivers us now, the water of immersion, which is not the removal of dirt from the body, but one’s pledge to keep a good conscience toward God, through the resurrection of Yeshua the Messiah.”
The act of water baptism as practiced in Christianity (and to a lesser degree in Messianic Judaism) is very closely related to the ancient Jewish practice of betrothal.[1] (This is in itself a lengthy study I hope to address some day on the web site-- but for now, the “Reader’s Digest” version will have to suffice.) The Scriptures are full of this marriage symbolism. God repeatedly calls Israel His “bride,” and “the ecclesia” (erroneously translated as “church”) is called “the Bride of Messiah.” [Question to ponder: if Yeshua is God, is He a polygamist? Does He have two brides? As Replacement Theology heretically teaches, has God (Who hates divorce, Malachi 2:16) divorced Israel and replaced her with his new bride, the Church (making God an adulterer)? Or does “the Church” become “grafted in” to “Israel His bride”? ]
In the betrothal process, a young man would take a fancy to a young woman, and would ask his father to go “buy” her for him. The boy’s father would meet with the girl’s father, and the “bride price” would be negotiated. Then the boy and his father would write out the ketubah, or marriage contract [the Torah is in many respects God’s ketubah with Israel]. The boy would go to the girl’s home and present her with the ketubah and a cup of wine. After reading the ketubah, if the girl accepted its terms and conditions, she would drink the cup of wine, indicating her acceptance [her “pledge to keep a good conscience” toward him, and to keep herself pure until he returned for her].
The boy would then pay the bride price [“You have been bought for a price.” (1Cor 6:20] and recite the to the girl the ritual phrase, “I’m going to prepare a place for you. If I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to myself, that where I am, there you may be also” (John 14:2,3). [And he would not drink wine with her again until after the marriage was consummated, usually about a year later.]
He would then leave and begin construction on the new rooms that would form an addition to his father’s house, which would become the couple’s “apartment.” The son would never know when his father would consider the construction complete, but when the father was satisfied with the new apartment, he would tell the son to go claim his bride.
The son would then immediately gather his part of the wedding party and set out to the girl’s home, usually in the evening. A “forerunner” [the “best man”] would be sent ahead of the groom, and as he approached the girl’s home, he would blow the shofar. The bride would hear the sound of the shofar and don her bridal clothes, and go out to meet her bridegroom. The bridesmaids, who hopefully had their lamps filled, would light them and go out to join the wedding party. The wedding ceremony would be immediately performed, followed by the seven-day wedding feast.
The symbolism here is striking, and serves to interpret several of the Lord’s parables, as well as to explain many of His actions at the Passover Seder he shared on the night He was arrested.
By accepting and drinking the cup, the talmidim [disciples], on behalf of all Believers who would come later, accepted Yeshua’s ketubah (which is the Torah) and became “betrothed” to Him. [According to John’s gospel, Judas left before the ketubah was offered and accepted.]
And I feel that what Peter was trying to say in 1Pet. 3:21 is that water baptism is the Believer’s initial pledge to accept Yeshua’s ketubah and became “betrothed” to Him. This pledge is re-affirmed each time the Believer partakes of “the Lord’s Supper.” In Messianic Judaism, the “Lord’s Supper” is sometimes observed as part of the Passover seder. It is Jewish (including Messianic Jewish) practice to observe the Kiddush on erev Shabbat, the night before Shabbat (the Sabbath, Saturday), on Shabbat, and on Holy Days and their eves. This is what Yeshua was doing at His final dinner with His disciples. (See the informative article on MyJewishLearning.com)]
Although I haven’t yet taken the time to address the subject on my website, I take very literally the concept of the “new creation” (2Cor 5:17; Gal. 6:15-- same word, translated differently). Again, as David Stern renders them: “Therefore, if anyone is united with the Messiah, he is a new creation-- the old has passed; look, what has come is fresh and new.” “For neither being circumcised nor being uncircumcised matters; what matters is being a new creation.”
I believe that through the process of regeneration Ruach HaKodesh takes one form of creation, a sinner, and places that sinner positionally “into Messiah” where the sinner literally becomes a new form of creation (a new “species” if you will), called in Scripture a “Saint”-- one who has been literally transformed and sanctified (set apart for God’s special use). I also believe that this concept figures heavily into the concept of “eternal security”-- how can a butterfly ever return to being a caterpillar?-- the transition is permanent.
As alluded to in my Baptism study, though not spelled out in any particular detail, I believe this transformation process is part and parcel of the process of salvation. The caterpillar enters the cocoon, “dies”, and re-emerges as a butterfly. Yeshua died, entered the tomb, and emerged in His resurrected and glorified body which He will wear for all eternity. Just so, the new believer performs a reenactment of this process [which has already occurred on the spiritual plane] when he or she is placed beneath the waters of the mikvah and emerges to walk as a “new creation in Messiah.”
I hope these additional comments prove helpful to you.
Shalom in Messiah!!
1. The Rabbinical process of “converting” to Judaism (a traditional process not supported by Scripture, but unfortunately embraced by some Messianic Jewish congregations) which has been practiced since well before Yeshua’s time consists of taking a Hebrew name, circumcision (for men), offering a sacrifice in the Temple (one obviously can’t do that part without a Temple), and immersion in a mikvah. The proselyte enters the mikvah as a goy (Gentile), and emerges as a Jew. From that moment on, the person is considered to be the same as if he/she had been born of two Jewish parents. Since the inception of this practice, the Jews have called this process being “born again” (as a Jew). Is is no wonder that Nakdimon (Nicodemus) was confused when Yeshua told him that he must be “born again.” He was already a Jew, a member of the Jewish supreme court! How was it possible for him to be “converted” to Judaism? [BACK]
See also Messianic Gerut (Conversion).
|
|
|
